Spics, Jews, Wogs, Trump, Woke and Freedumb to spew suit

Sun Ra

Baked
Community Member
User ID
2854
Not pretending to know you, mate—just reading the autobiography you volunteered with those flexing photos of being a retired customs agent. You’re the one putting your credentials on display like a badge of honour while ranting against the very systems you once enforced. Irony much? But hey, if contradictions are your style, who am I to interrupt the show?
Listen Hound - people do jobs they sometimes didn't think they'd end up in. You don't know what I did there. Let me tell you. I kept you and yours safe as best I could. I didn't agree with everything we did but I had a family to feed. I can sleep at night just fine. I have given some people here advice about bringing in seeds. Maybe it helped, maybe it didn't. I've lost seeds as well. Big fucking deal. I like to smoke pot and always have. I couldn't do it for a while due to Morrison and Dutton when they were ministers bringing in drug testing at work. Many people there smoked weed and were in the same position as me.
 

Please join our community to continue reading

Forgot your password?
Don't have an account? Register now

HomeBound_Hound

Blooming
Community Member
User ID
455
Let’s not rewrite history, SunRa. You’re the one who brought your border security credentials into a thread about getting seeds through customs, posting pictures to flex like 'I know better than you.' Someone dismissed what you said, and instead of having a proper discussion, you went straight to flaunting your past career like it was a trump card.

Now you’re trying to act like I’m the one pretending to know you while doing exactly that to me. Where’s the consistency? If you’re gonna come out swinging with names like 'tool' and 'fuckwit,' don’t turn around and play victim when I push back. You opened this door, mate. I’m just walking through it.
 

HomeBound_Hound

Blooming
Community Member
User ID
455
SunRa, let’s be real here—this hostility isn’t about my points or even this debate. It’s been clear from the start that your issue with me boils down to one thing: I use tools like AI to articulate my arguments. That’s the hill you’ve chosen to die on, and honestly, it’s a weak one. Instead of engaging with the ideas themselves, you’ve repeatedly resorted to personal attacks and dismissive remarks as though the tools I use somehow invalidate my thoughts. Newsflash: They don’t.

If your problem is with AI, fine. But don’t hide that behind insults and double standards. We’re here to debate ideas, not credentials or tools. So if you’re ready to move past the cartoon villain routine and have an actual conversation, I’m here. If not, well, I guess that says more about you than me.
 

Johnny Walker

Germinating
User ID
7186
It’s interesting to see how quickly the tone of discourse can shift when the conversation challenges deeply held ideals. First, I’m “weak” and part of the problem, yet now, apparently, we share common ground. The rhetorical backflips here are starting to resemble a high school debate: dramatic declarations, shifting alliances, and attempts to score points rather than engage with substance.

Let’s be honest—discussions like these aren’t just about ideals; they reveal our values. Are we here to genuinely exchange perspectives, or are we indulging in the kind of posturing that makes us feel superior without advancing the conversation? Resorting to accusations of ego or condescension isn’t a rebuttal; it’s an evasion. Dismissing opposing views as “too complex” reduces nuanced arguments to caricature.

Values matter. Ideals matter. But if the best counterpoint you can offer is “remember to stay classy,” then I’d suggest re-evaluating what exactly you’re standing for. The real work—whether in debates or in addressing systemic inequities—requires more than recycled rhetoric and thinly veiled jabs. It demands intellectual honesty and a willingness to confront complexity head-on.

So, I’ll leave it here. My intent has always been to dissect the issues thoughtfully, not to indulge in theatrics. If we’re here to play a game of rhetoric, let’s at least ensure we’re aiming higher than adolescent antics. Otherwise, we’re just spinning our wheels. Cheers.



Ah, the choir grows louder, but the song remains the same: ‘Tax them fairly, and all will be right.’ It’s fascinating how often the conversation circles back to this one-dimensional solution as if the entire system is a simple equation waiting to be solved. Accountants, financial advisors, and resources exist for those willing to navigate the same maze we’re all placed in—wealth isn’t a birthright for everyone who earns over $300k. Yet, the argument here boils down to envy disguised as advocacy for fairness.

The tools are out there, but too often, people don’t take the time to use them because it’s easier to vent frustrations than tackle the hard work of figuring things out. Yelling about the problem might feel good in the moment, but it doesn’t actually fix anything where it matters.
You have said the exact same thing 4 times now and you accuse others of lacking substance.

You long draw out replies don't make you sound as knowledgeable as you consider yourself to be and like GG your attempts to twist what I write to suit your views are easily outed.

I've said the same thing multiple time but you also lack comprehension or are so arrogant that you'll try to twist what I write into something it's not.

Ok last time. I think billionaires should be fairly taxed.
2nd like I said in my post this morning I think your views are weak about just accepting a broken system and people should just know how to navigate it like you do to get ahead.
The article proves the system is broken by billionaires wealth increasing while others stay the same or go backwards.
Now if you understood how to actually engage you would of had a counter but instead you have extremely long posts attacking my character and try to psychology analyse me and others.

Sorry mate but you not as intellectually gifted as you emense ego tells you you are!
At least you have stopped with the childish memes.
Trying to stay classy are you?
 

HomeBound_Hound

Blooming
Community Member
User ID
455
You have said the exact same thing 4 times now and you accuse others of lacking substance.

You long draw out replies don't make you sound as knowledgeable as you consider yourself to be and like GG your attempts to twist what I write to suit your views are easily outed.

I've said the same thing multiple time but you also lack comprehension or are so arrogant that you'll try to twist what I write into something it's not.

Ok last time. I think billionaires should be fairly taxed.
2nd like I said in my post this morning I think your views are weak about just accepting a broken system and people should just know how to navigate it like you do to get ahead.
The article proves the system is broken by billionaires wealth increasing while others stay the same or go backwards.
Now if you understood how to actually engage you would of had a counter but instead you have extremely long posts attacking my character and try to psychology analyse me and others.

Sorry mate but you not as intellectually gifted as you emense ego tells you you are!
At least you have stopped with the childish memes.
Trying to stay classy are you?
Repeating the same points wrapped in different words doesn’t make them more compelling. It’s telling how quickly this discussion has shifted from substance to personal attacks, as if undermining me somehow strengthens your position. If your point is that the system is broken, we agree—it’s the solutions where we differ. Dismissing engagement as ‘long posts’ or ‘ego’ doesn’t refute the facts; it just signals avoidance.

Cheers to staying classy, mate.
Sad Will Ferrell GIF.gif
 

Sun Ra

Baked
Community Member
User ID
2854
SunRa, let’s be real here—this hostility isn’t about my points or even this debate. It’s been clear from the start that your issue with me boils down to one thing: I use tools like AI to articulate my arguments. That’s the hill you’ve chosen to die on, and honestly, it’s a weak one. Instead of engaging with the ideas themselves, you’ve repeatedly resorted to personal attacks and dismissive remarks as though the tools I use somehow invalidate my thoughts. Newsflash: They don’t.

If your problem is with AI, fine. But don’t hide that behind insults and double standards. We’re here to debate ideas, not credentials or tools. So if you’re ready to move past the cartoon villain routine and have an actual conversation, I’m here. If not, well, I guess that says more about you than me.
Whatever Dr Clones.
 

Sun Ra

Baked
Community Member
User ID
2854
Obsession ? I've said it once. Just now. Your AI isn't so smart after all. It's NOT artificial and it's NOT intelligent as you make clear.
 

Johnny Walker

Germinating
User ID
7186
Repeating the same points wrapped in different words doesn’t make them more compelling. It’s telling how quickly this discussion has shifted from substance to personal attacks, as if undermining me somehow strengthens your position. If your point is that the system is broken, we agree—it’s the solutions where we differ. Dismissing engagement as ‘long posts’ or ‘ego’ doesn’t refute the facts; it just signals avoidance.

Cheers to staying classy, mate.
View attachment 56329
Well I've said enough.
I've made my point clear to you and others over 4 times now. I've even dumbed it down.

Using AI to articulate your point shows you lack the substance needed to engage person to person.
This is backed up by the childish memes.
 

HomeBound_Hound

Blooming
Community Member
User ID
455
Well I've said enough.
I've made my point clear to you and others over 4 times now. I've even dumbed it down.

Using AI to articulate your point shows you lack the substance needed to engage person to person.
This is backed up by the childish memes.
The irony of claiming I 'lack substance' while your entire argument hinges on blaming all problems on the super-rich without engaging in anything deeper. I didn't hide behind blanket accusations or simplistic solutions—I challenged your points directly and made it clear that this isn't about finding the perfect fix in a forum rant but about dissecting ideas.

And the memes? Well, they’re perfectly fitting for a space like this—a forum designed for rants, not TED Talks. If you’re feeling 'butthurt' because I didn’t just nod along to your views, that’s on you, mate. This isn’t about me using AI or your attempt to dismiss it as lacking 'person-to-person' engagement—it’s about having an actual exchange, which I did. If you can’t separate critique from personal offence, maybe step back and reevaluate why you’re here
 

Johnny Walker

Germinating
User ID
7186
The irony of claiming I 'lack substance' while your entire argument hinges on blaming all problems on the super-rich without engaging in anything deeper. I didn't hide behind blanket accusations or simplistic solutions—I challenged your points directly and made it clear that this isn't about finding the perfect fix in a forum rant but about dissecting ideas.

And the memes? Well, they’re perfectly fitting for a space like this—a forum designed for rants, not TED Talks. If you’re feeling 'butthurt' because I didn’t just nod along to your views, that’s on you, mate. This isn’t about me using AI or your attempt to dismiss it as lacking 'person-to-person' engagement—it’s about having an actual exchange, which I did. If you can’t separate critique from personal offence, maybe step back and reevaluate why you’re here
Not once did I say taxing the elite would fix everything.
Put it here where I have said that.

Once again your attempting to twist things to suit yourself.
Taxing people who don't pay tax to contribute to services they use is what I've said and they should be paying the top taxable amount because they are earning the top taxable amount.
Yes having more money in the system should make it better for several areas that are struggling like health, education, essentials like police, infrastructure and the environment.
Same as I've said this entire thread.


But here you are again saying the same thing you said 3 post ago and pretending your here for anything more that to flex you intellect.
You offer nothing because you think nothing is wrong.
Only need to look at how hard a lot of people are struggling to realise something is wrong.

Anyway I've only responded because I'm taking a shit so I'll leave it at that and you can write a meaningless word salard essay in response and some childish memes to show off you level of understanding.
 

Sedge

The man your mother warned you about.
Staff member
Community Member
User ID
5
Repeating the same points wrapped in different words doesn’t make them more compelling. It’s telling how quickly this discussion has shifted from substance to personal attacks, as if undermining me somehow strengthens your position. If your point is that the system is broken, we agree—it’s the solutions where we differ. Dismissing engagement as ‘long posts’ or ‘ego’ doesn’t refute the facts; it just signals avoidance.

Cheers to staying classy, mate.
View attachment 56329
It’s a bit funny hearing you talk about personal attacks after
you bagged out Tunkers coz HIS plant weren’t up to YOUR satisfaction.
 

HomeBound_Hound

Blooming
Community Member
User ID
455
It’s a bit funny hearing you talk about personal attacks after
you bagged out Tunkers coz HIS plant weren’t up to YOUR satisfaction.
To be fair, I felt bad after my first message, but when he decided to call me out, I simply gave him the energy he was asking for. Is that really on me?
 
Top Bottom