Pedro de pacas
FIGJAM - Artisan of Bullshit.
- User ID
- 115
Years of Minima | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 19 | 19.8 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Earliest Entry | 1998 | 1998 | 1998 | 1997 | 1997 | 1997 | 1997 | 1997 | 1997 | 1997 | 1997 | 1997 | 1997 |
Latest Entry | 2017 | 2017 | 2017 | 2017 | 2017 | 2016 | 2016 | 2016 | 2016 | 2016 | 2016 | 2016 | 2017 |
Years of Maxima | 19 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 19 | 19.8 |
Earliest Entry | 1998 | 1998 | 1998 | 1997 | 1997 | 1997 | 1997 | 1997 | 1997 | 1997 | 1997 | 1997 | 1997 |
Latest Entry | 2017 | 2017 | 2017 | 2017 | 2017 | 2016 | 2016 | 2016 | 2016 | 2016 | 2016 | 2016 | 2017 |
Years of Rainfall | 19 | 19 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 19 | 19.6 |
Earliest Entry | 1998 | 1998 | 1998 | 1997 | 1997 | 1997 | 1997 | 1997 | 1997 | 1997 | 1997 | 1997 | 1997 |
Latest Entry | 2017 | 2017 | 2017 | 2017 | 2017 | 2016 | 2016 | 2016 | 2016 | 2016 | 2016 | 2016 | 2017 |
False mate. That study showed one part of the artic ice cap was putting on ice over a short period. It also showed that the same icecap was still loosing ice in other parts quicker than it was putting on ice during the same time and over a longer period that same icecap had still lost ice and the gains hadn’t been anywhere near close to the ice that had been lost. The research is highly contested within the community as well for not being accurate because of the way in which measurement where taken.There is only 2 ice caps, one is huge and gaining ice according to NASA
the other cunt was going to be gone long before now, its not
Antarctic mate, what's that doing ???False mate. That study showed one part of the artic ice cap was putting on ice over a short period. It also showed that the same icecap was still loosing ice in other parts quicker than it was putting on ice during the same time and over a longer period that same icecap had still lost ice and the gains hadn’t been anywhere near close to the ice that had been lost. The research is highly contested within the community as well for not being accurate because of the way in which measurement where taken.
It’s also worth nothing this is a direct quote from the author of the paper you love throwing up. View attachment 10121
even the dude that wrote the paper still thinks climate change is happening and is a serious problem and that his findings don’t change that.
What issue ?? there is no issue to deal with, be an ice age along one day, then there will be a issueusing localised data to support your (false) point does t help your cause mate. Climate change isn’t happening over 10-20 years the effects are felt over 50-100 years. Doesn’t matter to you thou you’ll be long dead when your kids and grandkids are dealing with the issues.
here’s an informative (and slightly funny) video for you to watch.
Says the straw man with cherry pickedYou believer cunts never show up in winter do ya's
Give it a couple of warm days and out you all come with ya doom and gloom
Stupid video from the 5 seconds I seen of it
Now ya just being a dickheadSays the straw man with cherry picked
Data
can’t handle someone who did some actual research? I suppose the whole video is essentially ridiculing the arguments people like yourself come up with for climate change. He even goes on about your stupid study on the icecaps and why it’s bullshit and proves nothing in relation to climate change.
I can't stand those wind towers eitherIf you lot want solar and wind towers, electric cars, there needs to be a lot more mining that what we have now
wind towers and solar panels are a blight on nature, FFS who chops trees down to put up fucking wind towers
Think you will find its the "rich greedy" cunts making the $$$ out of the climate scam