The Random Discussion / Argument Thread

R3za92

Baked
User ID
261
But Woolworths are still a shareholder ? Are they still shareholders Rezza or fucking not
Yeah 9% as opposed to their previous 85% and in decline. There’s a difference between holding shares vs being in control of a business as well. Bruce “the pokie king” Mathieson owns 15% and Australian super owns 8.7% so have almost as much sway as kWoolworths (or in Bruce’s case almost double the influence)

It’d be more correct to call it Bruce’s company than Woolworths’s
 

Please join our community to continue reading

Forgot your password?
Don't have an account? Register now

R3za92

Baked
User ID
261
But Woolworths are still a shareholder ? Are they still shareholders Rezza or fucking not
Yeah 9% as opposed to their previous 85% and in decline. There’s a difference between holding shares vs being in control of a business as well. Bruce “the pokie king” Mathieson owns 15% and Australian super owns 8.7% so have almost as much sway as Woolworths (or in Bruce Mathiesons case almost double the influence)

It’d be more correct to call it Bruce’s company than Woolworths’s
 

Sun Ra

Baked
Community Member
User ID
2854

SAW

Curing
Community Member
User ID
4213
Yes that sloth must be a fan of Douglas Adams and towels, and their importance for interstellar travelers.
My totem species.
 
Top Bottom